Reproductive health in the time of Covid-19
Missed Pills: The Problem That Hasn’t Gone Away
Find the “yes! . . . and” rather than “no” or “but”
Digital Family Planning: the Future is Now
Irregular Bleeding Due to Contraceptives
Ouch! Best approaches to menstrual pain
Contraceptive efficacy: understanding how user and method characteristics play their part
Strategizing treatment for chronic heavy menstrual bleeding
Untangling the literature on obesity and contraception
High tech apps for no-tech FABM
Menstrual exacerbation of other medical conditions
From Princeton University: Thomas James Trussell (1949-2018)
The Short and Long of IUD Use Duration
Selecting a Method When Guidance Isn’t Clear-cut
Healthcare in the Time of Digital Expansion
The Scoop on Two New FDA-Approved Contraceptive Methods
Pregnancy of unknown location—meeting the challenge
Big “yes” (with caveats) to CHCs during perimenopause
The role of IUDs (LNG IUDs, too!) in emergency contraception
Combined pills’ effect on mood disorders
Abortion in the U.S.: safe, declining, and under threat
Hope for ovarian cancer screening test
Breast cancer still a small risk with some hormonal contraceptives
Record rate of HPV-related throat cancer
Viruses in semen potentially transmissible
Don’t Abstain from Your Role in Abstinence
Teens births declining but geographic ‘hotspots’ defy trend
Online Medical Abortion Service Effective and Safe
Do Women Really Need to Wait That Long?
Reassuring news on depression and OC use
PMDD: Genetic clues may lead to improved treatment
Breast cancer risk when there is a family history
Body weight link to breast and endometrial cancers (and 11 others)
Family Planning in 2017 and Beyond
Make Me Cry: Depression Link (Again)?
Managing implant users’ bleeding and spotting
Zika: Updated guidance for providers
Pharmacist-prescribed contraceptives
Hot off the press! 2016 MEC and SPR
Zika virus fears prompt increased request for abortion in nations outlawing abortions
Opioid use epidemic among reproductive-age women
Good news on the family planning home front!
War Against Planned Parenthood Hurts Women
Win-win for both treatment and prevention
Menopause, mood, mental acuity, and hormone therapy
Emergency contraception for teens
Postpartum Contraception: Now, Not Later
Are we practicing what we preach?
Be alert to VTE in hormonal contraceptive users
LARC among teens increased 15-fold, but not enough
Brain cancer and hormonal contraception
Free tools: Easy access to the US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use
Alcohol consumption when pregnancy is unwanted or unintended
Latest Data on Contraceptive Use in the United States
LateBreaker sampler from Contraceptive Technology conference
Emergency Contraceptive Pill Efficacy and BMI/Body Weight
Handout on Unintended Pregnancy and Contraceptive Choice
Ask About Withdrawal (Really!)
Rules to Practice By: Safety First and Cleanliness is Close to. . .
What’s Vanity Fair Got Against the NuvaRing?
Promising New Treatment for Hepatitis C
Numbers matter, so make them simple for patients
The Recession’s Effect on Unintended Pregnancies
Lessons Learned from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: The Hull LARC Initiative
Applying the “New” Cervical Cytology Guidelines in Your Practice
Acute Excessive Uterine Bleeding: New Management Strategies
Medical indications for IUD use in teens
January 2015
The National Center for Health Statistics has released its latest report on contraceptive use in the United States. The NCHS data clearly show that contraceptive use is a mainstream behavior: nearly 70% of women between the ages of 25 to 44 currently use a method. Not surprisingly, use was lower among teens and young adults; nonetheless, just under half were currently contracepting. The most popular method? The pill, chosen by 16% of women. Following close behind in popularity was female sterilization (15.5%).
Interestingly, education level did not influence use. Similar percentages of women currently used a method across the range of schooling, from those with no high school diploma on through those with a college degree. However, education level did make a difference in regard to the method women chose. The lower a woman’s level of education, the greater the likelihood that she chose female sterilization. The opposite dynamic occurred in regard to pill use, with a linear line showing increased use with each incremental level of education. Condoms and LARC methods were the great equalizers in this case, with similar percentages of women using across education levels.
On the other hand, a woman’s age influenced method choice. While 7.2% of women chose LARC overall, women in their middle reproductive years, 35 to 34, were twice as likely to use (11.1%) a LARC method as were women who were younger (5.0%) or older (5.3%). Pill use was more popular among young women, 22.4% of women age 15-24 selecting oral contraceptives, 16.9% of women age 25 -34, and only 8.7% of women 35-44. As one would expect, few young women underwent female sterilization, but nearly one in three (31%) of women in the older age bracket did.
More than 99% of women who have ever had sexual intercourse have used at least one contraceptive method, with the greatest commonality being pill use: 4 of 5 sexually experienced women have relied on oral contraceptives at some time in their lives.
—Deborah Kowal, MA, PA, President & CEO, Contraceptive Technology Communications, Inc.
References:
Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. NCHS data brief, no 173. Hyattsville, MD. Accessed at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db173.pdf
Daniels K, Mosher WD and Jones J, Contraceptive methods women have ever used: United States, 1982–2010,National Health Statistics Reports, 2013, No. 62. Hyattsville, MD. Accessed at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr062.pdf